09 September 2010


Latest Forum Posts
RE: branchcodes and interop - Jamie - 09 Sep 2010 08:01 PM
RE: ICE Mail - Jamie - 09 Sep 2010 07:54 PM
RE: 'Copy to' doctor - Tracey - 09 Sep 2010 11:03 AM
RE: ICE Mail - Ben Houghton - 09 Sep 2010 09:15 AM
branchcodes and interop - Ben Houghton - 09 Sep 2010 09:09 AM
RE: System Managers SIG - Jamie - 08 Sep 2010 10:38 PM
RE: ICE Mail - Jamie - 08 Sep 2010 10:28 PM
RE: ICE Speed - Jamie - 08 Sep 2010 10:21 PM


Welcome to the Home of the ICE User Group

Non-registered users are free to view the forums however you must login to post new items and access other site content.  This site is open to all existing and potential users of the ICE range of products.  If you would like an account, please click the Register link at the top of the page.

Whilst these topics are reviewed by Sunquest employees, if you have a specific support issue or technical question, you should contact the support team or your Implementation Specialist for advice.

International Sunquest User Group 2010

If you are looking to register for the International Sunquest User Group Conference 2010, please login.  If you do not have an account, please click the Register link at the top of the page.  If you have an account but cannot remember your password, click the Login link above and then choose Forgot Password.



Copied reports replacing originals
Last Post 24 Dec 2009 01:15 PM byDeeJay. 3 Replies.
Printer Friendly
Sort:
PrevPrev NextNext
You are not authorized to post a reply.
AuthorMessages
EmmaUser is Offline
New Member
New Member
Posts:17

--
23 Dec 2009 08:43 AM  

Hi All,

Just looking for a bit of advice and see how other people manage a problem that we have come across.

When a report is generated in our pathology system, we have rules set up for certain ones to be copied to another location eg. Cancer Registry.

This causes us a problem as both reports travel through PMIP and go to Ice but the second replaces the first so the report appears to be from Cancer Registry as the original for Ward Z has been hidden as a duplicate.

I know this is not a fault with Ice and it is behaving as it should, but can anyone help with a work around to this so that the original requesting location shows? Pathology are worried that a result could be missed by clinicans viewing reports by location.

Thanks in Advance,

Emma

DaveJUser is Offline
New Member
New Member
Posts:28

--
23 Dec 2009 03:46 PM  

First question that springs to mind is why does your LIMS produce a PMIP report for Cancer Registry. If I thought about it long enough I could probably see the logic but hey, it's Xmas and I'm feeling lazy

EmmaUser is Offline
New Member
New Member
Posts:17

--
23 Dec 2009 03:54 PM  
Hi Dave- I'm not sure to be honest! I have asked our pathology department so I'll let you know!!
DaveJUser is Offline
New Member
New Member
Posts:28

--
24 Dec 2009 01:15 PM  

Emma

I've though about it a bit now and maybe it's just a coincedence. I imagine that your LIMS will be set to produce a copy report to the Cancer registry upon the reporting of a cancer finding or appropriate Snowmed code or similar. This is probably done by rule base that automatically produces it and identifies it by a location code set in the system that indicates cancer reg or something. It's whether or not they receive this electronically into another system via a PMIP message or whether this location has just been automatically added to the PMIP location table within the LIMS as a matter of course. If they don't need it just ask the LIMS system manager to take it out of the PMIP locations table. If they do need it, it's back to the old drawing board

You are not authorized to post a reply.

Active Forums 4.2
Privacy Statement  |  Terms Of Use
Copyright 2010 by Sunquest Information Systems (Europe) Ltd.