07 February 2012


Latest Forum Posts
Workstation locations - James - 07 Feb 2012 01:40 PM
Copy to functionality for GP requesters - Mark S - 06 Feb 2012 10:44 AM
RE: upgraging to IE8 - Peter Anderson - 24 Jan 2012 09:59 AM
GP Out of Hours Service - Adastra - Peter Anderson - 24 Jan 2012 09:06 AM
RE: upgraging to IE8 - DaveJ - 18 Jan 2012 11:40 AM
upgraging to IE8 - Scottie - 10 Jan 2012 10:11 AM
RE: Hyperlink to advice in result reporting - David Drew - 23 Dec 2011 09:12 AM
Hyperlink to advice in result reporting - michaeloconnor - 23 Dec 2011 09:03 AM
RE: Dynamic Function Tests - eg Glucose Tolerance - Louise Platt - 22 Dec 2011 12:17 PM
RE: Family Origins Questionnaire - michaeloconnor - 14 Dec 2011 11:10 AM


Welcome to the Home of the ICE User Group

Non-registered users are free to view the forums however you must login to post new items and access other site content.  This site is open to all existing and potential users of the ICE range of products.  If you would like an account, please click the Register link at the top of the page.

Whilst these topics are reviewed by Sunquest employees, if you have a specific support issue or technical question, you should contact the support team or your Implementation Specialist for advice.

Ammended reports
Last Post 01 Jul 2010 04:02 PM byjaved.khan. 5 Replies.
Printer Friendly
Sort:
PrevPrev NextNext
You are not authorized to post a reply.
AuthorMessages
Javed KhanUser is Offline
New Member
New Member
Posts:5

--
04 Dec 2009 11:31 AM  

We are hoping to go live with ICE at the Mid Yorkshire Hospitals in January 2010. We are using ilab (APEX) and HL7 messaging. We've been doing some testing with ammended reports in blood sciences and we have come across something we never expected. As an example if a U & E profile is reported and then for whatever reason a single test e.g. a sodium is deauthorised in ilab and authorised again, a second report with just a sodium is sent across to ICE and the first U & E report is hidden. The only solution to this problem seems to be to deauthorise the whole U & E and authorise it again. Has anybody else come across this?   

DaveJUser is Offline
New Member
New Member
Posts:48

--
10 Dec 2009 08:59 AM  

The report messaging usually uses the lab number to cross reference. Therefore if you send out a further copy of the report on the same lab number, if will become the primary report and ICE will hide the older version. It sounds like an APEX issue to me. I think you are right and it would not happen if you unauthorised the whole lot and re-authorised it. As an aside, what does the printed version of the amended report look like?

Javed KhanUser is Offline
New Member
New Member
Posts:5

--
15 Dec 2009 12:08 PM  

The printed reports reports display in the same way. Our concern is that there is an inconsistency in the way amended reports display in ICE. If ICE sees the same test group header and the test(s) in the same order as the original report, it hides the original and displays the new report. If for example a potassium result is changed (second test in the group), ICE does not hide the original report. We've just had a conference call with Sunquest and there may be a possible solution to this which will require some development work. We will have to test this before I can comment any further.

mshereUser is Offline
New Member
New Member
Posts:1

--
05 Jan 2010 07:50 PM  
I am a clinical user, and we are using a system to look at mammogram reports - about 200 a week, send an ICEmail to an administrator with a code for him send a standard letter and to book the next mammogram in a year. This ammended reports thing is really annoying, because we do it quite a lot in radiology. When the report is ammended, the original report is hidden, but more importantly, so is its audit trail, so we can't tell whether we have dealt with the original report or not. The audit trail for the new ammended report starts blank. Is there any way to see the hidden report, or its audit trail.
DaveJUser is Offline
New Member
New Member
Posts:48

--
06 Jan 2010 02:02 PM  

I'm pretty sure you can view hidden reports based on the setting of the user roles in Permissions. Choose permissions from the admin section, then hide/show reports. Each user role can be altered to allow/disallow access to hidden and interim reports with, presumably, their associated audit trail but don't quote me on that bit.

As you are a clinical user, you will probably have to speak nicely to your system administrator to make some changes to your user profiles - if it were me, I'd do it for you, especially if you have chocolate

Javed KhanUser is Offline
New Member
New Member
Posts:5

--
01 Jul 2010 04:02 PM  

Sunquest have provided us with a fix for this problem. It took a while to get there but it now does the job we want it to do and it has been approved by our clinical leads.

The inconsistencies in how amended reports were displayed in the past have gone. The only remaining issue is that we can't access the audit trail for a hidden report, although Sunquest administrators can. I've been told this has been fixed in the alpine release which is now available. 

Does anyone know who to edit a post subject? I want to change the spelling but I can't do it.

You are not authorized to post a reply.

Active Forums 4.2
Privacy Statement  |  Terms Of Use
Copyright 2010 by Sunquest Information Systems (Europe) Ltd.